Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1965 1
1969 1
1970 1
1972 1
1974 4
1975 3
1976 1
1977 5
1978 2
1980 4
1983 1
1994 1
1999 2
2004 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 2
2010 3
2011 14
2012 2
2013 4
2014 9
2015 13
2016 11
2017 9
2018 14
2019 34
2020 20
2021 27
2022 28
2023 18
2024 8

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

223 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
The following term was not found in PubMed: Biberman-Shalev
Page 1
Point-of-Care Testing for Influenza.
Mason J. Mason J. 2016 Nov 3. In: CADTH Issues in Emerging Health Technologies. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2016–2021. 149. 2016 Nov 3. In: CADTH Issues in Emerging Health Technologies. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2016–2021. 149. PMID: 27977096 Free Books & Documents. Review.
The cobas Liat System is a rapid, reverse transcription (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) point-of-care test that may be as effective as gold standard (lab-based) methods for diagnosing influenza A and influenza B. Rapid RT-PCR tests for influenza may be better at detec …
The cobas Liat System is a rapid, reverse transcription (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) point-of-care test that may be as effect …
Clinical Performance of the cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B Assay in Nasal Samples.
Akashi Y, Horie M, Kiyotaki J, Takeuchi Y, Togashi K, Adachi Y, Ueda A, Notake S, Nakamura K, Terada N, Kurihara Y, Kiyasu Y, Suzuki H. Akashi Y, et al. Mol Diagn Ther. 2022 May;26(3):323-331. doi: 10.1007/s40291-022-00580-8. Epub 2022 Apr 7. Mol Diagn Ther. 2022. PMID: 35391608 Free PMC article.
In the participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the Liat assay using nasopharyngeal samples, 88.2% of their nasal samples also tested positive using the Liat assay. ...Some discordance occurred in samples with Ct values > 30 on the Liat assay....
In the participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the Liat assay using nasopharyngeal samples, 88.2% of their nasal samples a …
Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review.
Liakos KG, Busato P, Moshou D, Pearson S, Bochtis D. Liakos KG, et al. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 14;18(8):2674. doi: 10.3390/s18082674. Sensors (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30110960 Free PMC article. Review.
Clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection on the cobas Liat using water gargle samples.
Veillette M, Tourangeau F, Fafard J, Dumaresq J, Labbé AC; G-SPIT study group. Veillette M, et al. J Clin Virol Plus. 2022 Nov;2(4):100108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100108. Epub 2022 Sep 13. J Clin Virol Plus. 2022. PMID: 36117531 Free PMC article.
Amongst 110 paired samples, 25 (23%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the cobas Liat for a least one sample type, with a kappa coefficient of 0.92. Agreement between the cobas Liat platform and the Seegene assay was also excellent (kappa coefficient values of 0.94 an …
Amongst 110 paired samples, 25 (23%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the cobas Liat for a least one sample type, with a kappa coeffic …
Obesity in obstetrics.
Liat S, Cabero L, Hod M, Yogev Y. Liat S, et al. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Jan;29(1):79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Aug 15. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015. PMID: 25214436 Review.
Real-world Evaluation of a Sample Pooling Strategy for Large-Scale Rapid COVID-19 Testing.
Lee HR, Wang FY, Li JL, Chou TY, Ho HL. Lee HR, et al. J Clin Virol. 2022 Apr;149:105133. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105133. Epub 2022 Mar 15. J Clin Virol. 2022. PMID: 35338949 Free PMC article.
RESULTS: The 5-sample pooling strategy did not affect the positive detection rates on Liat or cobas 6800 in samples with Ct values <25 or 2530. However, in samples with low viral loads (Ct values >30), five-sample pooling has a higher positive detection rate on POC …
RESULTS: The 5-sample pooling strategy did not affect the positive detection rates on Liat or cobas 6800 in samples with Ct values &l …
Rapid Cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 Assay in Comparison with the Laboratory-Developed Real-Time RT-PCR Test.
Er TK, Chou YC, Chen SY, Huang JW. Er TK, et al. Clin Lab. 2021 Nov 1;67(11). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210316. Clin Lab. 2021. PMID: 34758239
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, a prefect agreement exists between the detection of SARS-CoV-2 conducted with the cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B nucleic acid test and the RT-PCR. The cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B nucleic acid test is a reliable method fo …
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, a prefect agreement exists between the detection of SARS-CoV-2 conducted with the cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 and …
Performance comparison of the cobas Liat and Cepheid GeneXpert systems for Clostridium difficile detection.
Granato PA, Hansen G, Herding E, Chaudhuri S, Tang S, Garg SK, Rowell CR, Sickler JJ. Granato PA, et al. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 24;13(7):e0200498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200498. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30040852 Free PMC article.
We compared the clinical performance of the cobas Liat Cdiff test to the previously introduced Xpert C. difficile/Epi test; both tests are FDA-cleared PCR assays that detect the toxin B (tcdB) gene of C. difficile. ...The clinical performance of the cobas Liat Cdiff …
We compared the clinical performance of the cobas Liat Cdiff test to the previously introduced Xpert C. difficile/Epi test; both test …
Human-Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review.
Benos L, Moysiadis V, Kateris D, Tagarakis AC, Busato P, Pearson S, Bochtis D. Benos L, et al. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 28;23(15):6776. doi: 10.3390/s23156776. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37571559 Free PMC article. Review.
223 results