Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PLoS One. 2016 Sep 12;11(9):e0162756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162756. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Background: Some but not all prior studies have shown that women receiving a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have a lower risk of death and appropriate shocks than men.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of gender on the risk of appropriate shock, all-cause mortality and inappropriate shock in contemporary studies of patients receiving a primary prophylactic ICD.

Data source: PubMed, LIVIVO, Cochrane CENTRAL between 2010 and 2016.

Study selection: Studies providing at least 1 gender-specific risk estimate for the outcomes of interest.

Data extraction: Abstracts were screened independently for potentially eligible studies for inclusion. Thereby each abstract was reviewed by at least two authors.

Data synthesis: Out of 680 abstracts retained by our search strategy, 20 studies including 46'657 patients had gender-specific information on at least one of the relevant endpoints. Mean age across the individual studies varied between 58 and 69 years. The proportion of women enrolled ranged from 10% to 30%. Across 6 available studies, women had a significantly lower risk of first appropriate shock compared with men (pooled multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 0.62 (95% CI [0.44; 0.88]). Across 14 studies reporting multivariable adjusted gender-specific hazard ratio estimates for all-cause mortality, women had a lower risk of death than men (pooled hazard ratio 0.75 (95% CI [0.66; 0.86]). There was no statistically significant difference for the incidence of first inappropriate shocks (3 studies, pooled hazard ratio 0.99 (95% CI [0.56; 1.73]).

Limitations: Individual patient data were not available for most studies.

Conclusion: In this large contemporary meta-analysis, women had a significantly lower risk of appropriate shocks and death than men, but a similar risk of inappropriate shocks. These data may help to select patients who benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Defibrillators, Implantable / adverse effects*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Sex Factors

Grants and funding

The research leading to the results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program FP7/2007-2013 under grant agreement№ 602299, EU-CERTICD. David Conen was supported by grants of the Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P3_159322). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.