van der Smagt MJ - Search Results

1

Storage for free: a surprising property of a simple gain-control model of motion aftereffects.

van de Grind WA, van der Smagt MJ, Verstraten FA. van de Grind WA, et al. Among authors: van der smagt mj. Vision Res. 2004;44(19):2269-84. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.012. Vision Res. 2004. PMID: 15208013 Free article.

2

Influence of viewing distance on aftereffects of moving random pixel arrays.

van de Grind WA, Verstraten FA, van der Smagt MJ. van de Grind WA, et al. Among authors: van der smagt mj. Vision Res. 2003 Oct;43(23):2413-26. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00431-0. Vision Res. 2003. PMID: 12972392 Free article.

3

Integration after adaptation to transparent motion: static and dynamic test patterns result in different aftereffect directions.

Verstraten FA, van der Smagt MJ, Fredericksen RE, van de Grind WA. Verstraten FA, et al. Among authors: van der smagt mj, van de grind wa. Vision Res. 1999 Feb;39(4):803-10. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00136-9. Vision Res. 1999. PMID: 10341966 Free article.

4

Integration and segregation of local motion signals: the role of contrast polarity.

van der Smagt MJ, van de Grind WA. van der Smagt MJ, et al. Among authors: van de grind wa. Vision Res. 1999 Feb;39(4):811-22. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00133-3. Vision Res. 1999. PMID: 10341967 Free article.

5

Center-surround interactions in visual motion processing during binocular rivalry.

Paffen CL, te Pas SF, Kanai R, van der Smagt MJ, Verstraten FA. Paffen CL, et al. Among authors: van der smagt mj. Vision Res. 2004;44(14):1635-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.02.007. Vision Res. 2004. PMID: 15136000 Free article.

6

Center-surround inhibition and facilitation as a function of size and contrast at multiple levels of visual motion processing.

Paffen CL, van der Smagt MJ, te Pas SF, Verstraten FA. Paffen CL, et al. Among authors: van der smagt mj. J Vis. 2005 Jul 6;5(6):571-8. doi: 10.1167/5.6.8. J Vis. 2005. PMID: 16097869 Free article.

7

Disengaging attention sets the temporal limit of attentive tracking.

Benjamins JS, Hooge IT, van der Smagt MJ, Verstraten FA. Benjamins JS, et al. Among authors: van der smagt mj. Vision Res. 2007 Apr;47(8):1055-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.006. Epub 2007 Jan 8. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17208269 Free article. Clinical Trial.

8

Center-surround effects on perceived speed.

van der Smagt MJ, Verstraten FA, Paffen CL. van der Smagt MJ, et al. Vision Res. 2010 Aug 23;50(18):1900-4. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jun 25. Vision Res. 2010. PMID: 20600233 Free article.

9

Suppressed images selectively affect the dominant percept during binocular rivalry.

Stuit SM, Paffen CL, van der Smagt MJ, Verstraten FA. Stuit SM, et al. Among authors: van der smagt mj. J Vis. 2011 Sep 15;11(10):7. doi: 10.1167/11.10.7. J Vis. 2011. PMID: 21920853 Free article.

10

Grouping of optic flow stimuli during binocular rivalry is driven by monocular information.

Holten V, Stuit SM, Verstraten FAJ, van der Smagt MJ. Holten V, et al. Among authors: van der smagt mj. Vision Res. 2016 Oct;127:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 12. Vision Res. 2016. PMID: 27520852 Free article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

63 results

Search Page