Skinner MW - Search Results

1

Restoring hearing symmetry with two cochlear implants or one cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid.

Firszt JB, Reeder RM, Skinner MW. Firszt JB, et al. Among authors: skinner mw. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(5):749-67. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.08.0120. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008. PMID: 18816424 Free article. Review.

2

Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing.

Firszt JB, Holden LK, Reeder RM, Skinner MW. Firszt JB, et al. Among authors: skinner mw. Otol Neurotol. 2009 Feb;30(2):146-52. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181924ff8. Otol Neurotol. 2009. PMID: 19106769 Free PMC article.

3

Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, Holden TA, Brenner C, Potts LG, Gotter BD, Vanderhoof SS, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner MW. Holden LK, et al. Among authors: skinner mw. Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):342-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7. Ear Hear. 2013. PMID: 23348845 Free PMC article.

4

Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.

Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, Tobey EA, Peterson A, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Wackym PA. Firszt JB, et al. Among authors: skinner mw. Ear Hear. 2004 Aug;25(4):375-87. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000134552.22205.ee. Ear Hear. 2004. PMID: 15292777

5

Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).

Potts LG, Skinner MW, Litovsky RA, Strube MJ, Kuk F. Potts LG, et al. Among authors: skinner mw. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):353-73. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.6.4. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009. PMID: 19594084 Free PMC article.

6

Effect of increased IIDR in the nucleus freedom cochlear implant system.

Holden LK, Skinner MW, Fourakis MS, Holden TA. Holden LK, et al. Among authors: skinner mw. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007 Oct;18(9):777-93. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.9.6. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007. PMID: 18354886

7

Optimizing cochlear implant speech performance.

Skinner MW. Skinner MW. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2003 Sep;191:4-13. doi: 10.1177/00034894031120s903. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2003. PMID: 14533838 Review.

8

The effect of instantaneous input dynamic range setting on the speech perception of children with the nucleus 24 implant.

Davidson LS, Skinner MW, Holstad BA, Fears BT, Richter MK, Matusofsky M, Brenner C, Holden T, Birath A, Kettel JL, Scollie S. Davidson LS, et al. Among authors: skinner mw. Ear Hear. 2009 Jun;30(3):340-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819ec93a. Ear Hear. 2009. PMID: 19322085 Free PMC article.

9

Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.

Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA. Potts LG, et al. Among authors: skinner mw. Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):495-511. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc16e. Ear Hear. 2007. PMID: 17609612

10

The efficacy of a structured group therapy intervention in improving communication and coping skills for adult cochlear implant recipients.

Heydebrand G, Mauze E, Tye-Murray N, Binzer S, Skinner M. Heydebrand G, et al. Int J Audiol. 2005 May;44(5):272-80. doi: 10.1080/14992020500060404. Int J Audiol. 2005. PMID: 16028790

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

163 results

Search Page