Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

882 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Results By Year timeline is not available.
Page 1
The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction.
Potter S, Conroy EJ, Williamson PR, Thrush S, Whisker LJ, Skillman JM, Barnes NL, Cutress RI, Teasdale EM, Mills N, Mylvaganam S, Branford OA, McEvoy K, Jain A, Gardiner MD, Blazeby JM, Holcombe C; Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative. Potter S, et al. Among authors: mills n. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Aug 4;2:41. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0085-8. eCollection 2016. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016. PMID: 27965859 Free PMC article.
Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire.
Mylvaganam S, Conroy E, Williamson PR, Barnes NLP, Cutress RI, Gardiner MD, Jain A, Skillman JM, Thrush S, Whisker LJ, Blazeby JM, Potter S, Holcombe C; iBRA Steering Group; Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative. Mylvaganam S, et al. Breast. 2017 Oct;35:182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 30. Breast. 2017. PMID: 28768227 Free PMC article.
The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction EvAluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Harvey KL, Mills N, White P, Holcombe C, Potter S; Pre-BRA Feasibility Study Steering Group. Harvey KL, et al. Among authors: mills n. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 26;10(1):e033641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033641. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 31988232 Free PMC article.
Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study).
Davies C, Holcombe C, Skillman J, Whisker L, Hollingworth W, Conefrey C, Mills N, White P, Comins C, Macmillan D, Fairbrother P, Potter S. Davies C, et al. Among authors: mills n. BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 16;11(4):e046622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046622. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33863715 Free PMC article.
Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
Roberts K, Mills N, Metcalfe C, Lane A, Clement C, Hollingworth W, Taylor J, Holcombe C, Skillman J, Fairhurst K, Whisker L, Cutress R, Thrush S, Fairbrother P, Potter S. Roberts K, et al. Among authors: mills n. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e050886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050886. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34848516 Free PMC article.
882 results