Kobak KA - Search Results

1

Sources of unreliability in depression ratings.

Kobak KA, Brown B, Sharp I, Levy-Mack H, Wells K, Ockun F, Williams JB. Kobak KA, et al. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Feb;29(1):82-5. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318192e4d7. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009. PMID: 19142114

2

Computer-administered clinical rating scales. A review.

Kobak KA, Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Katzelnick DJ. Kobak KA, et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Oct;127(4):291-301. doi: 10.1007/s002130050089. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996. PMID: 8923563 Review.

3

Development of a standardized training program for the Hamilton Depression Scale using internet-based technologies: results from a pilot study.

Kobak KA, Lipsitz JD, Feiger A. Kobak KA, et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;37(6):509-15. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(03)00056-6. J Psychiatr Res. 2003. PMID: 14563382

4

Rater training in multicenter clinical trials: issues and recommendations.

Kobak KA, Engelhardt N, Williams JB, Lipsitz JD. Kobak KA, et al. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Apr;24(2):113-7. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000116651.91923.54. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15206656 No abstract available.

5

A comparison of face-to-face and videoconference administration of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Kobak KA. Kobak KA. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(4):231-5. doi: 10.1258/1357633041424368. J Telemed Telecare. 2004. PMID: 15273034

6

A new approach to rater training and certification in a multicenter clinical trial.

Kobak KA, Lipsitz JD, Williams JB, Engelhardt N, Bellew KM. Kobak KA, et al. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Oct;25(5):407-12. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000177666.35016.a0. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005. PMID: 16160614

7

Enriched rater training using Internet based technologies: a comparison to traditional rater training in a multi-site depression trial.

Kobak KA, Engelhardt N, Lipsitz JD. Kobak KA, et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Apr;40(3):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.07.012. Epub 2005 Sep 28. J Psychiatr Res. 2006. PMID: 16197959 Clinical Trial.

8

Why the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale endures.

Bech P, Engelhardt N, Evans KR, Gibertini M, Kalali AH, Kobak KA, Lipsitz JD, Williams JB, Pearson JD, Rothman M. Bech P, et al. Among authors: kobak ka. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;162(12):2396; author reply 2397-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2396. Am J Psychiatry. 2005. PMID: 16330618 No abstract available.

9

Rating the raters: assessing the quality of Hamilton rating scale for depression clinical interviews in two industry-sponsored clinical drug trials.

Engelhardt N, Feiger AD, Cogger KO, Sikich D, DeBrota DJ, Lipsitz JD, Kobak KA, Evans KR, Potter WZ. Engelhardt N, et al. Among authors: kobak ka. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;26(1):71-4. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000194621.61868.7c. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006. PMID: 16415710

10

A novel approach to rater training and certification in multinational trials.

Jeglic E, Kobak KA, Engelhardt N, Williams JB, Lipsitz JD, Salvucci D, Bryson H, Bellew K. Jeglic E, et al. Among authors: kobak ka. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Jul;22(4):187-91. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3280803dad. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007. PMID: 17519640

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

91 results

Search Page