Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

2,473 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Results By Year timeline is not available.
Page 1
Overall Distribution of Rubidium in Highly Efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells.
Schöppe P, Schönherr S, Jackson P, Wuerz R, Wisniewski W, Ritzer M, Zapf M, Johannes A, Schnohr CS, Ronning C. Schöppe P, et al. Among authors: jackson p. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018 Nov 28;10(47):40592-40598. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b16040. Epub 2018 Nov 15. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018. PMID: 30383349
In-Operando Nanoscale X-ray Analysis Revealing the Local Electrical Properties of Rubidium-Enriched Grain Boundaries in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells.
Plass CT, Ritzer M, Schöppe P, Schönherr S, Zapf M, Hafermann M, Johannes A, Martínez-Criado G, Segura-Ruiz J, Würz R, Jackson P, Schnohr CS, Ronning C. Plass CT, et al. Among authors: jackson p. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020 Dec 23;12(51):57117-57123. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c17849. Epub 2020 Dec 11. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020. PMID: 33306357
Rubidium Fluoride Post-Deposition Treatment: Impact on the Chemical Structure of the Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Surface and CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Interface in Thin-Film Solar Cells.
Kreikemeyer-Lorenzo D, Hauschild D, Jackson P, Friedlmeier TM, Hariskos D, Blum M, Yang W, Reinert F, Powalla M, Heske C, Weinhardt L. Kreikemeyer-Lorenzo D, et al. Among authors: jackson p. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018 Oct 31;10(43):37602-37608. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b10005. Epub 2018 Oct 16. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018. PMID: 30272438
Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ayati N, McIntosh L, Buteau J, Alipour R, Pudis M, Daw N, Jackson P, Hofman MS. Ayati N, et al. Among authors: jackson p. Cancer Imaging. 2024 May 6;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x. Cancer Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38711135 Free PMC article.
2,473 results