Sensitivity and specificity of alternative screening methods for systematic reviews using text mining tools.
Li J, Kabouji J, Bouhadoun S, Tanveer S, Filion KB, Gore G, Josephson CB, Kwon CS, Jette N, Bauer PR, Day GS, Subota A, Roberts JI, Lukmanji S, Sauro K, Ismaili AA, Rahmani F, Chelabi K, Kerdougli Y, Seulami NM, Soumana A, Khalil S, Maynard N, Keezer MR.
Li J, et al.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;162:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023.
PMID: 37506951
Specificity was often higher for TM-assisted methods than that for CDS, although with mean differences of only one-to-two percentage points. For every 500 citations not requiring manual screening, 216 minutes (95% CI: 169, 264) could be saved. CONCLUSION: TM-assisted scree …
Specificity was often higher for TM-assisted methods than that for CDS, although with mean differences of only one-to-two percentage points. …