Objectives: The present sub-analysis from the randomized UDDC-Radial-Trial sought to compare one-catheter concepts (OCC) with two-catheter concepts (TCC) in different patient subgroups, particularly in those depending on gender and age.
Background: There is an ongoing debate regarding potential performance differences of OCC compared to TCC for transradial coronary angiography in specific patient subgroups.
Methods: The randomized UDDC-Radial-Trial enrolled a total of 300 patients planed for coronary angiography in a 2:1 ratio to either OCC by Tiger II (n = 100) and BLK (n = 100) or TCC by Judkins (n = 100) catheters. Predefined patient subgroups stratified for age, gender and patient constitution were analyzed with regard to the primary outcome measure of time required for a complete coronary angiography.
Results: In male patients time for coronary angiography was significantly shorter in the TCC group compared to the OCC group (510 ± 37 s vs. 615 ± 35 s; p = 0.046). No difference between the catheter concepts was observed in the subset of female patients (525 ± 34 s vs. 583 ± 54 s; p = 0.43). TCC was associated with shorter coronary angiography time in patients aged <71 years compared to OCC (462 ± 23 s vs. 570 ± 38 s; p = 0.018). In patients ≥72 years of age no difference was detected (573 ± 41 s vs. 636 ± 45 s; p = 0.31). Other subgroups showed no relevant differences in angiography time among OCC and TCC.
Conclusions: The present subgroup analysis from the UDDC-radial trial demonstrates the use of OCC in transradial diagnostic angiography to be inferior compared to TCC in terms of angiography time in younger and male patients.
Keywords: Coronary angiography; One-catheter concept; Radial catheter; Transradial access; Two-catheter concept.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.