[Clinical value of apolipoprotein B versus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in assessing risks of coronary artery disease]

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017 Jul 20;37(7):938-942. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.07.15.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To compare the value of apolipoprotein B (apoB) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in assessing the risk of coronary heart disease in patients with inconsistent apoB and LDL-C levels.

Methods: In a total of 603 patients undergoing coronary angiography, apoB and LDL-C levels were categorized into high and low levels relative to the median levels of apoB and LDL-C, based on which the patients were divided into 4 groups with low apoB/low LDL-C, low apoB/high LDL-C, high apoB/low LDL-C, or high apoB/high LDL-C. According to the results of coronary angiography, we evaluated the number of coronary artery branches with lesions and the severity of coronary artery stenosis in the 4 groups to assess the correlation of apoB and LDL-C with cardiovascular risks.

Results: We found significant differences in the number of coronary artery branches with lesions and the severity of coronary artery stenosis among the 4 groups (P<0.05). The number of coronary artery branches involved and the severity of stenosis differed significantly between patients with consistently high and low apoB/LDL-C levels (P<0.005). Compared with those with low apoB/low LDL-C levels, the patients with high apoB/low LDL-C levels showed a significantly greater number of coronary artery branches with lesions (P=0.017) and more severe stenosis (P=0.034), but such differences were not found in patients with low apoB/high LDL-C levels. Pearson correlation analysis identified LDL-C and apoB as the risk factors for cardiovascular disease with areas under the ROC curve of 0.579 (P=0.014) and 0.589 (P=0.006), respectively.

Conclusions: In patients with inconsistent levels of apoB and LDL-C, apoB and LDL-C levels are both risk factors of coronary heart disease in close relation with the disease severity. LDL-C and apoB are comparable for their important values in predicting the risk of coronary heart disease.

目的: 探讨在载脂蛋白B(apoB)与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)含量不一致情况下,比较apoB与LDL-C对冠心病风险评估的重要价值。

方法: 将接受冠脉造影检查的患者作为研究对象,共603例,根据apoB、LDL-C中位数水平分为低值组和高值组,然后两两组合,共分为4组(低apoB/低LDL-C组,低apoB/高LDL-C组,高apoB/低LDL-C组,高apoB/高LDL-C组),根据冠状动脉造影结果评估冠脉病变支数及冠状动脉狭窄程度,探讨apoB与LDL-C与冠心病及其病变严重程度之间的关系。

结果: 比较4组冠心病血管病变支、冠脉病变程度,差异明显存在统计学意义(P < 0.05)。当LDL-C、apoB含量一致时,与低低组相比,高高组的冠脉病变支数及冠脉病变程度有统计学差异(P < 0.05)。当apoB与LDL-C含量不一致时,与低低组相比,高apoB低LDL-C组冠脉病变支数明显增多(P=0.017),冠脉病变严重(P=0.034);而低apoB高LDL-C组冠脉病变支数及严重程度差异不明显(P>0.05)。采用Pearson相关性分析,LDL-C、apoB、均为冠心病的危险因子。比较LDL-C和apoB的ROC曲线下面积,LDL-C为0.579(P=0.014),而apoB为0.589(P=0.006)。

结论: 在apoB与LDL-C不一致情况下,apoB与LDL-C均为冠心病的危险因子,与冠心病病变程度密切相关,且apoB与LDL-C相比,在预测冠心病风险上同样具有重要的指导意义。

Publication types

  • English Abstract

Grants and funding

国家自然科学基金(81370380);广东省教育厅省级重大项目(2014KZDXM020);广州市科技计划科学研究专项一般项目(201510010090);南方医科大学临床研究培育项目(LC2016PY002)