[Evolution of followed renal oncocytomas]

Introduction: Oncocytomas are primitive kidney tumours, considered benign but their evolution is not fully established. The local progression is generally admitted but few data explain what makes a oncocytoma to grow more or less quickly. The objective of our study is to analyse the evolution of followed renal oncocytomas after histologic confirmation and to identify factors that can influence their growth.

Material and methods: This is a retrospective study in two centers (North Hospital and Hospital of the Conception of Marseille). All patients with renal oncocytoma diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy from September 2010 to April 2016 and followed for more than one year were included. Epidemiological, histological, and morphological data were collected at diagnosis, during follow-up and in case of strategy change (intervention). Statistical analysis of factors influencing oncocytomes growth was based on the Pearson correlation test.

Results: Fifty-three patients were included. The median age for diagnosis was 65 years [39-85]. The sex ratio H/F was 6/5. The median follow-up was 34 months [12-180]. The average diagnosis size was 29 mm [12-90]. Thirteen patients (25%) were treated secondarily, including 70% by conservative treatment. The average growth was 0.25 (±0.23) cm/yr. The patients treated were younger and had a higher growth rate than the untreated (0.48±0.23cm/yr versus 0.18±0.18cm/yr, P<0,001). According to Pearson's analysis, there was a positive linear relationship (R=0.27, P=0.047) between velocity and initial size and a negative linear relationship (ρ=-0.44, P<0.001) between velocity and age at diagnosis. So tumor growth was faster if the patients were young and the tumor voluminous at diagnosis.

Discussion: Rapid growth often leads to a cessation of surveillance in favour of an intervention strategy. For young patients, conservative treatment (partiel nephrectomy or ablative treatment) in the medium term is likely to be preferred, but for elderly patients or with important comorbidities follow-up is an alternative to an invasive attitude.

Level of evidence: 3.