Upstream-Downstream Joint Carbon Reduction Strategies Based on Low-Carbon Promotion

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 27;15(7):1351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071351.

Abstract

A differential game model is established to analyze the impact of emissions reduction efforts and low-carbon product promotion on the reduction strategies of low-carbon product manufacturers (subsequently referred to as manufacturers) and the retailers of such products in a dynamic environment. Based on this model, changes in emissions reduction efforts and promotional efforts are comparatively analyzed under three scenarios (retailers bearing the promotional cost, manufacturers bearing the promotional cost, and centralized decision-making). The results are as follows: (1) the trajectory of carbon emissions reduction per product unit is the highest when the supply chain is under centralized decision-making, followed by when manufacturers bear the promotional cost, and lastly when retailers bear the cost; (2) when manufacturers bear the promotional cost, the market demand, emissions reduction effort, and promotional effort are higher, although the unit retail price is higher than when retailers bear the promotional cost; and (3) under centralized decision-making, the unit retail price is the lowest; however, sales volume, the emissions reduction effort, and the promotional effort are all higher than those in the other scenarios.

Keywords: carbon reduction; differential game model; low-carbon promotion.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Air Pollution / prevention & control*
  • Carbon*
  • Climate Change
  • Commerce
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Decision Making
  • Game Theory
  • Marketing
  • Models, Theoretical*

Substances

  • Carbon