Abstract: Family firms are one of the most ubiquitous forms of business organizations worldwide. Their survival and growth are thus not only crucial for the firms themselves but also for the overall economy. One of the factors that influence their survival and development are their financing decisions. These decisions are generally described through the pecking order theory. However, not much is known about the applicability of this theory in private family firms. Given the shortcomings (both theoretically and empirically) of the current literature, we analyze 1087 incremental financing decisions from 277 family firms to develop and test a specific family firm pecking order. We integrate the elements of the socioemotional wealth perspective to theoretically explain the preferred order and introduce family capital into the pecking order model. Our findings indicate that family firms first prefer internal financing, next debt financing, followed by family capital, and last external capital. We also find that SEW considerations play a role in this financing decision. Especially the retention of control over the firm and the aim to pass the firm to the next generation appear to play an important role in determining this order. These dimensions ensure that family firms try to avoid extra capital. However, when it is needed, they will opt for family capital over external capital. This paper thus provides more insight into the reasoning behind financing decisions in private family firms.
Plain english summary: How do family firms finance their investments? When looking for ways to finance their investments, firms have several options. According to traditional finance theories, they generally follow a so-called pecking order: they prefer to first use their internal funds, before turning to external financing. For family firms, the most ubiquitous form of business organization worldwide, two important aspects have been ignored in this research until now. First, socioemotional aspects influence decision-making in family firms and thus probably also financing decisions. Next, the business family itself can act as an external source of finance, which is not yet accounted for in the current pecking order model. In this research, we take these issues into account in order to develop-theoretically and empirically-a family firm pecking order. We investigate over a thousand financing decisions of 277 privately held family firms. Our results show that they prefer internal financing, followed by bank debt, family capital, and external capital. Especially the retention of control over the firm and the aim to pass the firm to the next generation appear to play an important role in determining this order. Our research thus indicates that future research should pay attention to the peculiarities of family firms when investigating their financing decision.
Keywords: Family firms; Financing decisions; Pecking order; Small- and medium-sized firms; Socioemotional wealth.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.