Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems

Eur Oral Res. 2019 Jan;53(1):21-24. doi: 10.26650/eor.201972917418. Epub 2019 Jan 1.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcracks comparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc, and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography.

Subjects and methods: Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups (n = 10) as follows, ProTaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File system. Preoperative and postoperative scans were obtained at the isotropic resolution of 13.68 µm. Cross-section images were examined to identify the presence of newly formed dentinal microcracks.

Results: The Self-Adjusting File and Reciproc systems caused a higher rate of new microcrack formation than the ProTaper Next group (p<0.001). There were also significant differences in the new microcrack formation between Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File groups (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems caused a higher rate of newly formed microcraks compared to ProTaper Next system.

Keywords: Protaper Next; Reciproc; dentinal microcracks; micro–computed tomography; self-Adjusting File.