The flux-based PIN allocation mechanism can generate either canalyzed or diffuse distribution patterns depending on geometry and boundary conditions

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054802. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

Abstract

Growth and morphogenesis in plants require controlled transport of the plant hormone auxin. An important participant is the auxin effluxing protein PIN, whose polarized subcellular localization allows it to effectively transport auxin large distances through tissues. The flux-based model, in which auxin flux through a wall stimulates PIN allocation to that wall, is a dominant contender among models determining where and in what quantity PIN is allocated to cell walls. In this paper we characterise the behaviour of flux-based PIN allocation models in various tissues of the shoot apical meristem. Arguing from both mathematical analysis and computer simulations, we describe the natural behaviours of this class of models under various circumstances. In particular, we demonstrate the important dichotomy between sink- and source- driven systems, and show that both diffuse and canalized PIN distributions can be generated simultaneously in the same tissue, without model hybridization or variation of PIN-related parameters. This work is performed in the context of the shoot apical and floral meristems and is applicable to the construction of a unified PIN allocation model.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Biological Transport
  • Computer Simulation
  • Diffusion
  • Indoleacetic Acids / metabolism
  • Meristem / growth & development*
  • Meristem / metabolism*
  • Models, Biological*
  • Plant Development*
  • Plant Growth Regulators / metabolism
  • Plant Proteins / metabolism*

Substances

  • Indoleacetic Acids
  • Plant Growth Regulators
  • Plant Proteins

Grants and funding

This work was funded by ANR, partners of the ERASysBio+ initiative supported under the EU ERA-NET Plus scheme in FP7, iSAM project. It also received funding from the ANR grant GeneShape and from the Institute for Computational Biology of Montpellier (IBC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.