Long-term loss in extent and current protection of terrestrial ecosystem diversity in the temperate and tropical Americas

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0234960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234960. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Documenting changes in ecosystem extent and protection is essential to understanding status of biodiversity and related ecosystem services and have direct applications to measuring Essential Biodiversity Variables, Targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. We developed both potential and current distribution maps of terrestrial ecosystem types for the temperate and tropical Americas; with "potential" estimating where a type would likely occur today had there not been prior land conversion for modern land uses. We utilized a hierarchical classification to describe and map natural ecosystem types at six levels of thematic detail, with lower thematic levels defining more units each with narrower floristic range than upper levels. Current land use/land cover was derived using available global data on human land use intensity and combined with the potential distribution maps to estimate long-term change in extent for each ecosystem type. We also assessed representation of ecosystem types within protected areas as defined by IUCN I-VI land status categories. Of the 749 ecosystem types assessed, represented at 5th (n = 315) vs. 6th (n = 433) levels of the classification hierarchy, 5 types (1.6%) and 31 types (7.1%), respectively, have lost >90% of their potential extent. Some 66 types (20.9%) and 141 types (32.5%), respectively, have lost >50% of their potential extent; thus, crossing thresholds of Vulnerable status under IUCN Red List criterion A3. For ecosystem type representation within IUCN protected area classes, with reference to potential extent of each type, 111 (45.3%) and 125 (28.8%) of types, respectively, have higher representation (>17%) than CBD 2020 targets. Twelve types (3.8%) and 23 (5.3%) of types, respectively, are represented with <1% within protected areas. We illustrate an option for visualizing and reporting on CBD targets (2020 and proposed post-2020) for ecosystem representativeness using both potential extent as a baseline.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Americas
  • Biodiversity*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / statistics & numerical data
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / trends*
  • Ecological Parameter Monitoring / statistics & numerical data
  • Ecological Parameter Monitoring / trends
  • Ecology / methods*
  • Ecology / trends
  • Plant Dispersal*
  • Rainforest
  • Tropical Climate

Grants and funding

All authors were supported in this effort in part by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) https://www.iucn.org/ (contract #P00497) with funds originating with the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation https://www.moore.org/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.