Agroecosystem resilience. A conceptual and methodological framework for evaluation

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0220349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220349. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

This article proposes a conceptual and methodological framework for analyzing agroecosystem resilience, in which aspects such as agrarian structure and peasant community agency are included as determining factors. The methodology is applied to a comparison of two peasant communities in Latin America (Brazil and Colombia), emphasizing the capacity to transform unsustainable power structures in place of adapting to them. We find that when agrarian structure is more equitable and peasant agency is strongly developed through political formation, organization and women's participation, then there is a greater construction of resilience that improves peasant livelihoods and dignity. This application demonstrates that when agency is strongly developed, as in the case of Brazil, it is possible to transform structural conditions that restrict resilience. The inclusion and consideration of biophysical variables, management practices, agrarian structure and agency, through a participatory approach, allows for the identification of factors that inhibit or potentiate the resilience of agroecosystems.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture* / organization & administration
  • Brazil
  • Colombia
  • Ecosystem
  • Employment
  • Farmers
  • Humans
  • Politics
  • Rural Population
  • Social Planning
  • Socioeconomic Factors

Grants and funding

This work received funding through the payment of salary as Associate Professor of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia to Javier Toro Calderón, and salary as a post-doctoral researcher by the Interdisciplinary Center of Development Studies (CIDER) of the Universidad de los Andes for Cindy Cordoba and Der Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst (DAAD) and The Center for Development Research (ZEF) is an institute of the University of Bonn, Germany for support of publication costs. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.