Association between Use of Nutritional Labeling and the Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 14;16(22):4486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224486.

Abstract

In this study, we looked into the association between the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and nutritional label awareness. This study used data from the Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (KNHANES) for the years 2007 to 2015. The study population consisted of a total of 41,667 Koreans of which 11,401 (27.4%) were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome and 30,266 (72.6%) were not. Groups not using nutritional labeling had a 24% increase in odds risk (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35) of MetS compared to groups using nutritional labeling. Use of nutritional labeling was associated with all components of MetS. Central obesity showed the highest increase in odds risk (OR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.35) and high blood pressure showed the lowest increase in odds risk (OR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20). Subgroup analysis revealed that statistically significant factors were smoking status, drinking status and stress status. Groups that smoke, groups that do not drink and groups with high stress were more vulnerable to MetS when not using nutritional labeling. People not using food labels tends to develop metabolic syndromes more than people using foods labels. In the subgroup analysis, drinking status, smoking status and stress status were significant factors.

Keywords: Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey; drinking; metabolic syndrome; nutritional labeling; smoking; stress.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Alcohol Drinking / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Food Labeling*
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / epidemiology
  • Male
  • Metabolic Syndrome / epidemiology*
  • Middle Aged
  • Nutrition Surveys
  • Obesity / epidemiology
  • Republic of Korea / epidemiology
  • Smoking / epidemiology
  • Young Adult