The role of temperature on the development of circadian rhythms in honey bee workers

PeerJ. 2024 Mar 15:12:e17086. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17086. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Circadian rhythms in honey bees are involved in various processes that impact colony survival. For example, young nurses take care of the brood constantly throughout the day and lack circadian rhythms. At the same time, foragers use the circadian clock to remember and predict food availability in subsequent days. Previous studies exploring the ontogeny of circadian rhythms of workers showed that the onset of rhythms is faster in the colony environment (~2 days) than if workers were immediately isolated after eclosion (7-9 days). However, which specific environmental factors influenced the early development of worker circadian rhythms remained unknown. We hypothesized that brood nest temperature plays a key role in the development of circadian rhythmicity in young workers. Our results show that young workers kept at brood nest-like temperatures (33-35 °C) in the laboratory develop circadian rhythms faster and in greater proportion than bees kept at lower temperatures (24-26 °C). In addition, we examined if the effect of colony temperature during the first 48 h after emergence is sufficient to increase the rate and proportion of development of circadian rhythmicity. We observed that twice as many individuals exposed to 35 °C during the first 48 h developed circadian rhythms compared to individuals kept at 25 °C, suggesting a critical developmental period where brood nest temperatures are important for the development of the circadian system. Together, our findings show that temperature, which is socially regulated inside the hive, is a key factor that influences the ontogeny of circadian rhythmicity of workers.

Keywords: Circadian rhythms; Development; Honey bees; Temperature; Workers.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bees
  • Circadian Clocks*
  • Circadian Rhythm
  • Humans
  • Social Behavior*
  • Temperature

Grants and funding

This work was sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) awards 1026560, 1633184, 1707355, 2231637 and the National Institute of Health (NIH) 2R25GM061151-13, P20GM103475. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.