LGBTQ+ Students' Peer Victimization and Mental Health before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;19(18):11537. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811537.

Abstract

Given the well-established health disparities between lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and gender-expansive (LGBTQ+) and cisgender, straight youth, scholars predicted the COVID-19 pandemic would disproportionately impact LGBTQ+ students. Yet, few studies have described changes in LGBTQ+ students' school experiences and well-being during the pandemic. Using survey data from 40,904 middle and high school students, we examined changes from before (2018) to during (2021) the pandemic in peer victimization, anxiety, and suicide attempts. We conducted bivariate and multivariate regression analyses to assess changes between the two time points among LGBTQ+ and cisgender, straight students. We found LGBTQ+ students experienced more peer victimization, anxiety, and suicide attempts at both points, before and during the pandemic, than cisgender, straight youth. However, LGBTQ+ students reported increased anxiety, decreased peer victimization, and decreased suicide attempts in 2021, during the pandemic, compared to pre-pandemic 2018 reports. These findings suggest pandemic-related school disruptions may have provided LGBTQ+ students some relief from the harmful effects of poor, in-person school climates.

Keywords: COVID-19; LGBTQ+; adolescence; anxiety; gender; school climate; sexual orientation; suicide; victimization.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • COVID-19* / epidemiology
  • Crime Victims* / psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mental Health
  • Pandemics
  • Sexual and Gender Minorities*
  • Students

Grants and funding

Support for this research was provided by the University of Wisconsin—Madison Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. The research reported here was also supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Award #R305B200026 to the University of Wisconsin, Madison. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the U.S. Department of Education.