Recovery planning towards doubling wild tiger Panthera tigris numbers: Detailing 18 recovery sites from across the range

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0207114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207114. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

With less than 3200 wild tigers in 2010, the heads of 13 tiger-range countries committed to doubling the global population of wild tigers by 2022. This goal represents the highest level of ambition and commitment required to turn the tide for tigers in the wild. Yet, ensuring efficient and targeted implementation of conservation actions alongside systematic monitoring of progress towards this goal requires that we set site-specific recovery targets and timelines that are ecologically realistic. In this study, we assess the recovery potential of 18 sites identified under WWF's Tigers Alive Initiative. We delineated recovery systems comprising a source, recovery site, and support region, which need to be managed synergistically to meet these targets. By using the best available data on tiger and prey numbers, and adapting existing species recovery frameworks, we show that these sites, which currently support 165 (118-277) tigers, have the potential to harbour 585 (454-739) individuals. This would constitute a 15% increase in the global population and represent over a three-fold increase within these specific sites, on an average. However, it may not be realistic to achieve this target by 2022, since tiger recovery in 15 of these 18 sites is contingent on the initial recovery of prey populations, which is a slow process. We conclude that while sustained conservation efforts can yield significant recoveries, it is critical that we commit our resources to achieving the biologically realistic targets for these sites even if the timelines are extended.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Asia
  • Endangered Species*
  • Goals
  • Population Density
  • Predatory Behavior
  • Tigers*
  • Time Factors

Grants and funding

WWF Tigers Alive Initiative team, WWF-Network offices and WWF- National offices, the funders, provided support in the form of salaries for all authors when the work was carried out. AH & JB, TNEG and JPPC are currently employed by Panthera, Wildlife Alliance and Tamil Nadu Forest Department, respectively and receive salary support. Additionally, one of the authors (KP) is currently employed by PT. Royal Lestari Utama (a commercial venture) and receives salary support from the venture. Neither of the funders had any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors received no specific funding for this work and the roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.