A statistical assessment of population trends for data deficient Mexican amphibians

PeerJ. 2014 Dec 16:2:e703. doi: 10.7717/peerj.703. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background. Mexico has the world's fifth largest population of amphibians and the second country with the highest quantity of threatened amphibian species. About 10% of Mexican amphibians lack enough data to be assigned to a risk category by the IUCN, so in this paper we want to test a statistical tool that, in the absence of specific demographic data, can assess a species' risk of extinction, population trend, and to better understand which variables increase their vulnerability. Recent studies have demonstrated that the risk of species decline depends on extrinsic and intrinsic traits, thus including both of them for assessing extinction might render more accurate assessment of threats. Methods. We harvested data from the Encyclopedia of Life (EOL) and the published literature for Mexican amphibians, and used these data to assess the population trend of some of the Mexican species that have been assigned to the Data Deficient category of the IUCN using Random Forests, a Machine Learning method that gives a prediction of complex processes and identifies the most important variables that account for the predictions. Results. Our results show that most of the data deficient Mexican amphibians that we used have decreasing population trends. We found that Random Forests is a solid way to identify species with decreasing population trends when no demographic data is available. Moreover, we point to the most important variables that make species more vulnerable for extinction. This exercise is a very valuable first step in assigning conservation priorities for poorly known species.

Keywords: Data harvest; Encyclopedia of life; IUCN categories; Mexican amphibians; Random forests; Statistical assessment.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a grant “Using Digital Libraries to Discover Biodiversity and Evolution” from the Richard Lounsbery Foundation to CR McClain, and additional funds from CONABIO to E Quintero and P Arias-Caballero. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.