Public participation in crisis policymaking. How 30,000 Dutch citizens advised their government on relaxing COVID-19 lockdown measures

PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0250614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250614. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Following the outbreak of COVID-19, governments took unprecedented measures to curb the spread of the virus. Public participation in decisions regarding (the relaxation of) these measures has been notably absent, despite being recommended in the literature. Here, as one of the exceptions, we report the results of 30,000 citizens advising the government on eight different possibilities for relaxing lockdown measures in the Netherlands. By making use of the novel method Participatory Value Evaluation (PVE), participants were asked to recommend which out of the eight options they prefer to be relaxed. Participants received information regarding the societal impacts of each relaxation option, such as the impact of the option on the healthcare system. The results of the PVE informed policymakers about people's preferences regarding (the impacts of) the relaxation options. For instance, we established that participants assign an equal value to a reduction of 100 deaths among citizens younger than 70 years and a reduction of 168 deaths among citizens older than 70 years. We show how these preferences can be used to rank options in terms of desirability. Citizens advised to relax lockdown measures, but not to the point at which the healthcare system becomes heavily overloaded. We found wide support for prioritising the re-opening of contact professions. Conversely, participants disfavoured options to relax restrictions for specific groups of citizens as they found it important that decisions lead to "unity" and not to "division". 80% of the participants state that PVE is a good method to let citizens participate in government decision-making on relaxing lockdown measures. Participants felt that they could express a nuanced opinion, communicate arguments, and appreciated the opportunity to evaluate relaxation options in comparison to each other while being informed about the consequences of each option. This increased their awareness of the dilemmas the government faces.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • COVID-19* / epidemiology
  • COVID-19* / prevention & control
  • Communicable Disease Control* / methods
  • Community Participation*
  • Female
  • Government
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Netherlands / epidemiology
  • Policy Making*
  • Public Opinion
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The TU Delft Covid-19 Response fund sponsored our data collection effort. Niek Mouter acknowledges funding from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO Responsible Innovation grant – 313-99-333) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.