[Aortic root surgery: early postoperative results of different surgical techniques]

Medicina (Kaunas). 2009;45(3):197-202.
[Article in Lithuanian]

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate early postoperative results of different surgical techniques of aortic root surgery.

Material and methods: Between January 2004 and November 2007, a cohort of 83 patients underwent aortic root surgery in the Heart Center, Hospital of Kaunas University of Medicine. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (18 patients) - reimplantation of the aortic valve within a vascular graft (David operation), Group 2 (48 patients) - replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve using a valved conduit (Bentall de Bono operation), and Group 3 (17 patients) - biological aortic root replacement. Study protocol included clinical data, operative data, and postoperative major adverse effects: reoperations for bleeding, stroke and lethal outcomes.

Results: Patients undergoing biological aortic root replacement were older as compared with other groups. The mean age in the Group 1 was 50.3+/-3.5 years vs. 57+/-2.0 years in the Group 2 and 67.8+/-3.3 years in the Group 3 (P<0.05). The main indication for the aortic root surgery was the aneurysm of the aortic root and ascending aorta in the Group 1 and 2 patients (64.7% and 72%), while in the Group 3, the main indication was fibrocalcinosis of aortic valve, aortic annulus, and ascending aorta (61.1%). The 30-day hospital mortality rates were as follows: 5.8% (n=1), in the Group 1; 10.4% (n=5), in the Group 2; 5.5% (n=1), in the Group 3. In the early postoperative period, 11 reoperations were performed due to bleeding events: in the Group 1, after planned/emergency surgery (n=2/2), and in the Group 2 (n=1/6), respectively. The function of aortic valve improved significantly in all groups of patients early after surgery. In the Group 1, the degree of aortic regurgitation decreased from 2.5+/-0.8 to 1.1+/-0.6 (P<0.05); in the Groups 2 and 3, the mean gradient through the aortic valve decreased from 39.9+/-7.5 to 17.1+/-5.3 mm Hg and from 48.8+/-18.0 to 20.1+/-11.0 mm Hg, respectively (P<0.05). No reoperation for aortic valve failure before the discharge was required in all groups of patients, and neither thromboembolic complications nor stroke events were noted in any group.

Conclusions: Different aortic root surgery techniques showed similar postoperative results. New aortic root surgery methods such as aortic root-preserving/sparing procedures and concurrent aortic valve leaflet repair or aortic root replacement with the bioprosthesis can be selected for a diverse class of aortic root pathology with low perioperative mortality rates and good early postoperative results.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aorta / surgery*
  • Aortic Aneurysm / mortality
  • Aortic Aneurysm / surgery*
  • Aortic Dissection / mortality
  • Aortic Dissection / surgery*
  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency / mortality
  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency / surgery*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / mortality
  • Coronary Artery Bypass
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / mortality
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome