Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

32 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Results By Year timeline is not available.
Page 1
Commentary on: Hahn M, Anslinger K, Eckert M, Fimmers R, Grethe S, Hohoff C, et al. [Joint recommendations of the project group "Biostatistical DNA Calculations" and the Trace Commission on the Biostatistical Evaluation of Forensic DNA Analytical Findings with Fully Continuous Models (FCM)]. Rechtsmedizin (Berl). 2023; 33(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s00194-022-00599-5.
Berger CEH, Kruijver M, Hicks T, Champod C, Taylor D, Buckleton J. Berger CEH, et al. J Forensic Sci. 2024 Mar;69(2):730-735. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15424. Epub 2023 Nov 20. J Forensic Sci. 2024. PMID: 37986638 No abstract available.
A response to "Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look" by Lund and Iyer.
Gittelson S, Berger CEH, Jackson G, Evett IW, Champod C, Robertson B, Curran JM, Taylor D, Weir BS, Coble MD, Buckleton JS. Gittelson S, et al. Among authors: berger ceh. Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jul;288:e15-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.025. Epub 2018 May 22. Forensic Sci Int. 2018. PMID: 29857959 Free PMC article.
A review of likelihood ratios in forensic science based on a critique of Stiffelman "No longer the Gold standard: Probabilistic genotyping is changing the nature of DNA evidence in criminal trials".
Buckleton J, Robertson B, Curran J, Berger C, Taylor D, Bright JA, Hicks T, Gittelson S, Evett I, Pugh S, Jackson G, Kelly H, Kalafut T, Bieber FR. Buckleton J, et al. Forensic Sci Int. 2020 May;310:110251. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110251. Epub 2020 Mar 13. Forensic Sci Int. 2020. PMID: 32203853 Review.
Firearm examination: Examiner judgments and computer-based comparisons.
Mattijssen EJAT, Witteman CLM, Berger CEH, Zheng XA, Soons JA, Stoel RD. Mattijssen EJAT, et al. Among authors: berger ceh. J Forensic Sci. 2021 Jan;66(1):96-111. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14557. Epub 2020 Sep 24. J Forensic Sci. 2021. PMID: 32970858 Free PMC article.
More on the strength of evidence in forensic pathology.
Buiskool M, Nijs HG, Karst WA, Berger CE. Buiskool M, et al. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016 Jun;12(2):238-9. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9766-0. Epub 2016 Mar 28. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016. PMID: 27020888 No abstract available.
Color separation in forensic image processing.
Berger CE, de Koeijer JA, Glas W, Madhuizen HT. Berger CE, et al. J Forensic Sci. 2006 Jan;51(1):100-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00020.x. J Forensic Sci. 2006. PMID: 16423231
Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners.
Mattijssen EJAT, Witteman CLM, Berger CEH, Brand NW, Stoel RD. Mattijssen EJAT, et al. Among authors: berger ceh. Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Feb;307:110112. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110112. Epub 2019 Dec 19. Forensic Sci Int. 2020. PMID: 31881373
32 results