Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

1,574 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Results By Year timeline is not available.
Page 1
A Core Outcome Set for Seamless, Standardized Evaluation of Innovative Surgical Procedures and Devices (COHESIVE): A Patient and Professional Stakeholder Consensus Study.
Avery KNL, Wilson N, Macefield R, McNair A, Hoffmann C, Blazeby JM, Potter S; Core Outcomes for early pHasE Surgical Innovation and deVicEs (COHESIVE) study steering group. Avery KNL, et al. Among authors: hoffmann c. Ann Surg. 2023 Feb 1;277(2):238-245. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004975. Epub 2023 Jan 10. Ann Surg. 2023. PMID: 34102667 Free PMC article.
Using qualitative research methods to understand how surgical procedures and devices are introduced into NHS hospitals: the Lotus study protocol.
Elliott D, Blencowe NS, Cousins S, Zahra J, Skilton A, Mathews J, Paramasivan S, Hoffmann C, McNair AG, Ochieng C, Richards H, Hossaini S, Scroggie DL, Main B, Potter S, Avery K, Donovan J, Blazeby JM. Elliott D, et al. Among authors: hoffmann c. BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e049234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049234. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34862280 Free PMC article.
Identification of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set for surgical innovation: a targeted review of case studies of novel surgical devices.
Wilson N, Macefield RC, Hoffmann C, Edmondson MJ, Miller RL, Kirkham EN, Blencowe NS, McNair AGK, Main BG, Blazeby JM, Avery KNL, Potter S. Wilson N, et al. Among authors: hoffmann c. BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e056003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056003. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35487755 Free PMC article. Review.
A systematic review of robot-assisted anti-reflux surgery to examine reporting standards.
Huttman MM, Robertson HF, Smith AN, Biggs SE, Dewi F, Dixon LK, Kirkham EN, Jones CS, Ramirez J, Scroggie DL, Zucker BE, Pathak S, Blencowe NS; RoboSurg collaborative group. Huttman MM, et al. J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):313-324. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01453-2. Epub 2022 Sep 8. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 36074220 Free PMC article. Review.
What Are Patients Told About Innovative Surgical Procedures? A Qualitative Synthesis of 7 Case Studies in the United Kingdom.
Elliott D, Ochieng CA, Zahra J, McNair AGK, Main BG, Skilton A, Blencowe NS, Cousins S, Paramasivan S, Hoffmann C, Donovan JL, Blazeby JM; Lotus clinical innovator collaborators. Elliott D, et al. Among authors: hoffmann c. Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):e482-e490. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005714. Epub 2022 Sep 30. Ann Surg. 2023. PMID: 36177849 Free PMC article.
1,574 results