Are psychiatrists cost-effective? An analysis of integrated versus split treatment

Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Feb;156(2):324-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.2.324.

Abstract

Objective: Managed care organizations prefer putatively less expensive split treatment, i.e., a psychopharmacologist plus a non-M.D. psychotherapist. In this study the cost of integrated care by a psychiatrist was compared with split care.

Method: Using 1998 fee schedules of seven large managed care organizations (with 54.3% market share and 67.8 million lives) plus Medicare (37 million people), the author modeled clinical scenarios of psychotherapy alone, medication alone, and combined treatment provided by a psychiatrist or split with a psychologist or social worker.

Results: Brief psychotherapy by a social worker was the least expensive treatment. When treatment required both psychotherapy and medication, combined treatment by a psychiatrist cost about the same or less than split treatment with a social worker psychotherapist; it was usually less expensive than split treatment with a psychologist psychotherapist.

Conclusions: The integrated biopsychosocial model practiced by psychiatry is both theoretically and economically the preferred model when combined treatment is needed.

MeSH terms

  • Combined Modality Therapy / economics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Costs
  • Fee Schedules
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Managed Care Programs / economics
  • Managed Care Programs / organization & administration
  • Medicare / economics
  • Mental Disorders / drug therapy
  • Mental Disorders / economics
  • Mental Disorders / therapy*
  • Psychiatry / economics*
  • Psychiatry / methods
  • Psychology, Clinical / economics
  • Psychotherapy / economics*
  • Psychotherapy / methods
  • Psychotropic Drugs / economics
  • Psychotropic Drugs / therapeutic use
  • Social Work, Psychiatric / economics
  • United States

Substances

  • Psychotropic Drugs