Contribution of 42 patients, aged 57 to 69 (mean age 58) with infiltrant vesical neoplasia who underwent radical cystoprostatectomy according to the technique described by P.C. Walsh (38/42) or radical cystectomy with hysterectomy (4/42). Neoplasia stages were as follows: 7 T2G-III; 13 T3aGII: 15 T3aG-III and 7 T3bG-III. Ten (10) patients, aged between 48 and 70 (mean age 57), with prostate neoplasia who were performed radical prostatectomy using the technique described by the above author, were also ascribed to the last group. Prostate neoplasias were at the following stages: 4 T2c; 5 T3a and 1T3b. T3 stages had been given hormonal therapy prior to the procedure. No patient received radiotherapy. Rectal injury occurred in 2 of the 52 (2/52) patients described. One was a female patient who was being performed cystectomy and hysterectomy plus double adnexectomy. Urinary by-pass in this case was C.F.C. detubulized ureterosigmoidostomy. The second case was a male patient undergoing radical prostatectomy. In both cases pre- and post-operative discharge colostomy was performed. Suture of rectal injury was also done in the patient where colostomy was performed during the procedure. The authors emphasise that no rectal injury that may take place during radical prostatectomy or cystoprostatectomy should be disregarded. They raise and answer questions of great practical interest such as: Is simple suture of the rectum enough? Should the omentum be used in rectal repair? Is it indispensable to perform discharge colostomy? and, is prognosis more serious when the gut is not prepared?