How could the BSE crisis affect nutrient intake? Comparison of beef and non-beef eating meat eaters from the UK Women's Cohort Study

Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998 Feb;52(2):151-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600495.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare nutrient and food intakes in a group of meat eating women who ate beef with those who did not eat beef.

Design: Analysis of preliminary data from the UK Women's Cohort Study, a national study of women aged 35-69 y.

Subjects: Three thousand and eighty-six beef meat eaters from the cohort were compared with 593 non-beef meat eaters.

Results: The non-beef eaters had lower energy, protein, zinc, fat, percentage of energy from fat and body mass index and higher fibre and vitamin C intakes than the beef eaters. There was no difference between the groups in consumption of carbohydrate, sugar or iron.

Conclusion: There were differences in nutrient intake between the groups, which if reflected long term in the general population have implications for health and food policy following media revelations.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Animals
  • Body Mass Index
  • Cattle
  • Cohort Studies
  • Diet*
  • Dietary Fats / administration & dosage
  • Dietary Proteins / administration & dosage
  • Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform*
  • Energy Intake
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Meat*
  • Middle Aged
  • Nutritional Physiological Phenomena*
  • United Kingdom
  • Zinc / administration & dosage

Substances

  • Dietary Fats
  • Dietary Proteins
  • Zinc