Retest-reliability and convergent validity of noninvasive blood pressure determination: arm sphygmomanometry vs. Peñaz-method

Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1997 Nov;14(4):251-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03356570.

Abstract

Blood pressure is usually determined by arm sphygmomanometry. However, this technique does not allow continuous blood pressure monitoring. Over the last years, a technique introduced by Peñaz makes it feasible to determine blood pressure noninvasively and continuously from the finger artery. Study on 46 normotensives showed that both methods have high retest-reliabilities for systolic blood pressure while for diastolic blood pressure, arm sphygmomanometry resulted in lower reliabilities than the Peñaz-method. Between-method-comparisons showed only small correlations. Diastolic blood pressure levels were significantly lower in the Peñaz-method than in arm sphygmomanometry. In conclusion, blood pressure levels determined by arm sphygmomanometry and the Peñaz-method differ systematically because of different methodologies. If blood pressure or blood pressure changes are determined, the method and the circumstances of its application need to be carefully reported.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory / methods*
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory / standards
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sphygmomanometers / standards*