[Mortality and hospital stay adjusted for severity as indicators of effectiveness and efficiency of the care provided to critically ill patients. European and North American Study of Severity Systems]

Med Clin (Barc). 1997 May 3;108(17):647-51.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Background: Hospital mortality and length of stay, both adjusted for severity of illness, have been used as indicators of effectiveness and efficiency of health care in critical patients.

Patients and methods: 1,270 adult critical patients, consecutively admitted in 17 intensive care units (ICU) from Catalonia and the Balearic Islands, Spain, have been included. For each hospital, effectiveness has been assessed with a quality performance index (QOI) obtained by dividing the number of observed deaths by the number of deaths expected according to the MPM system (MPM II0). Efficiency has been assessed with a resource utilization index (RUI) obtained by dividing the number of observed weighted hospital days (WHD) by the number of expected WHD. WHD is a measure of resource use which weights ICU days more heavily than non-ICU days. Expected WHD have been obtained by a regression model including severity of illness and the presence/absence of surgery.

Results: Ten of the 17 hospitals life within one standard deviation of the mean on both clinical and economical indices. There are 3 hospitals with optimal values on both indices. There is no evidence of association between effectiveness and resource utilization.

Conclusions: Clinical and economical performance of hospitals can be quantified with simple indicators which allow to compare centers. Hospitals can be effective and efficient at the same time.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Critical Care / standards*
  • Critical Illness / therapy*
  • Hospital Mortality*
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data*
  • Quality of Health Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Severity of Illness Index