Secondary epileptogenesis as it applies to humans remains a controversial topic despite 40 years of investigation. Part of the controversy stems from disagreement about the definition of secondary epileptogenesis, and part of the controversy stems from the imperfect fit of animal models to the human epileptic syndromes. It may be that models of secondary epileptogenesis can be useful to describe specific epileptic syndromes such as bitemporal epilepsy and secondary bilateral synchrony, but other models may be required for remitting syndromes such as the Landau-Kleffner syndrome. The concept of secondary epileptogenesis may also provide a useful construct for evaluating patients with partial epileptic syndromes, especially those under consideration for epilepsy surgery, and for the evaluation of preventive strategies in epilepsy.