The aim of this paper was to discuss the techniques for intraoral digital radiography (radiovisiography) and to compare their accuracy in dental radiographical diagnosis. Emphasis was given to their potential applications in oral radiology. Radiovisiography was compared with intraoral films and electronic magnifications from digital panoramic radiographs in 38 patients, for a total amount of 36 caries, 27 periapical conditions and 58 metal implants. Moreover, the accuracy of the measurements made with the three techniques was assessed on a specimen of mandibular and maxillary arches containing 28 extracted teeth with endodontic files of known length. Radiovisiography was as effective as intraoral films and more effective than digital panoramic radiographs in the diagnosis of caries and periapical lesions. Nevertheless, it produced a significant magnification and yielded unreliable measurements of root canals and metal implants. Radiovisiography is very easy to use and does not require dark room procedures nor chemicals of any kind. In addition, it reduces patient's X-ray exposure by over 50% with respect to film studies. For these reasons, this technique seems to be worthy of widespread use in dental radiography, with the exception of the conditions requiring an exact measurement of working length.