Uncertainty about the generalizability of results from clinical trials is a nagging issue plaguing psychiatric research. The possible bias introduced by the use of subjects recruited from advertisements is one source of concern. Investigators question whether these subjects are representative of the types of individuals who seek treatment in clinical practice. This article compares and contrasts demographic characteristics, functional disabilities, symptomatologies, and the health beliefs and expectations of a cohort seeking treatment at a university outpatient clinic with a cohort of symptomatic volunteers recruited by advertisements. These two groups were alike in most variables; however, the clinical subjects reported more recent exposure to psychotropic medications and were more likely to indicate that they wanted psychotherapy. The symptomatic volunteers were slightly older, endorsed more psychiatric symptoms, drank more alcohol, and believed that combined pharmacology and psychotherapy would most help them. These findings suggest that the two cohorts were remarkably similar on most variables.