A comparison of resuscitation skills of qualified general nurses and ambulance nurses in The Netherlands

Heart Lung. 1993 Nov-Dec;22(6):509-15.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the ability of qualified general nurses to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to compare these skills with those of a group of ambulance nurses.

Design: Cross-sectional assessment of practical cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills.

Subjects: 141 Dutch general nurses.

Outcome measures: The practical skills were tested with six primary variables that describe the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques in a training situation. A total score on the skills was computed based on a predefined scoring system.

Results: The percentage of general nurses who were able to achieve a pass score (i.e., the total score did not exceed 15 penalty points) was 6.4 percent. The average score was 37.8 penalty points. Eighty-eight percent of the ambulance nurses achieved a pass score. The average number of penalty points was 10.5.

Conclusions: The practical skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation are insufficient in the majority of this sample of general nurses in The Netherlands. The findings of this study should be used as a base to design an optimal form and content of an educational re-instruction program. We expect that a considerable improvement could be achieved by more frequent cardiopulmonary resuscitation re-instruction.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Ambulances*
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / education
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / nursing*
  • Clinical Competence
  • Educational Measurement
  • Emergency Nursing*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Netherlands
  • Nursing Staff, Hospital*