The silicone gel breast implant controversy: current status and clinical implications

J Ark Med Soc. 1994 Feb;90(9):427-34.

Abstract

The silicone breast implant controversy has amassed a great deal of media coverage in the past year. Unfortunately, separating fact from fiction has been extremely frustrating and difficult, not only for physicians but for women who have either had or are considering cosmetic or reconstructive surgery of the breast. At a recent meeting attended by most of the board eligible and certified Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons in the State of Arkansas, it was felt that a consensus statement was needed to clarify the issues and inform other Arkansas physicians of the most up to date information. The result is a fairly comprehensive review which will require your indulgence. Breast implants are placed not only by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, but by Otolaryngologists, "Facial Plastic Surgeons", Obstetricians/Gynecologists, General Surgeons, Dermatologists and Family Practitioners. We believe it is the ethical and legal responsibility of the physicians who elect to perform these procedures to provide adequate care and follow-up for these patients when either real or perceived problems arise. Accurate information, reassurance and occasionally re-operations are required for many of these patients.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Autoimmune Diseases / diagnosis
  • Autoimmune Diseases / etiology*
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Breast Neoplasms / etiology*
  • Equipment Failure
  • Female
  • Foreign-Body Migration / diagnosis
  • Foreign-Body Migration / etiology*
  • Gels
  • Health Policy*
  • Humans
  • Mammaplasty*
  • Prostheses and Implants* / adverse effects
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Silicones*
  • United States
  • United States Food and Drug Administration / legislation & jurisprudence*

Substances

  • Gels
  • Silicones