Comparison of efficacy in crossing femoropopliteal artery occlusions with movable core and hydrophilic guidewires

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1994 Nov-Dec;17(6):319-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00203950.

Abstract

Purpose: Compare the recanalization rate of femoropopliteal occlusions between movable core wire guide (MG) and hydrophilic guidewire (HG).

Methods: Conventional PTA technique was used, followed by enclosed thrombolysis. The MG was used for all patients in the first 2 years, the HG in the following 2 years. Baseline characteristics were similar for the two groups of patients.

Results: Recanalization of 124 femoropopliteal occlusions was attempted. Technical success was achieved with the MG in 45 of 59 procedures; 42 procedures were clinically successful. Using the HG, technical success was achieved in 35 of 65 procedures; clinical success was achieved in 35 of 65 procedures; clinical success was achieved in 29 cases (p < 0.0048). At 1-year follow-up, 32 extremities improved after treatment with MG and 22 extremities after treatment with HG (p < 0.035).

Conclusion: The results suggest that the MG should be the first choice in recanalization of femoropopliteal occlusions.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angioplasty, Balloon / adverse effects
  • Angioplasty, Balloon / instrumentation*
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / therapy
  • Female
  • Femoral Artery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Popliteal Artery*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Thrombolytic Therapy