The aims of this study were twofold: firstly, to evaluate the relationship of supra- or subgingival calculus and bleeding on probing (BOP) in sextants coded 2 in the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN); and secondly, to compare the differences in four investigations in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan and Norway. In a national survey, a total of 2658 Chinese dentate adults were examined by using modified CPITN in the Taiwan area from 1985 to 1987. Sextants given Code 2 were divided into four subclassifications: supragingival calculus with bleeding (I+), supragingival calculus without bleeding (I-), subgingival calculus with bleeding (II+) and subgingival calculus without bleeding (II-). The results showed that of the 9394 sextants given Code 2, the highest percentage (70%) were characterized by the presence of subgingival calculus with bleeding and the lowest percentage (4%) by supragingival calculus with bleeding. The ratio of sextants coded 2 with only supragingival calculus versus subgingival was 1:6.2. The bleeding to nonbleeding ratio of sextants coded 2 in this study was similar to the Hong Kong study. However, differences among Taiwan, Japan and Norway were found. The results indicated that sextants with subgingival calculus had a higher tendency to BOP, with a ratio of 4:1. Those with supragingival calculus had a ratio of 3:7. We conclude therefore, that it is essential to scale teeth to remove subgingival calculus for determination of the necessity of periodontal treatment.