Background: Attempting to optimize treatment results in pediatric Hodgkin disease while minimizing major side effects, at least in early-stage patients, in 1983 the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP) conceived a multicenter study tailored according to stage, bulky mediastinal mass, and age.
Methods: Between December, 1983 and January, 1989, 215 evaluable patients (median age, 9.9 years, range, 1-15 years) received the AIEOP-MH 1983 Hodgkin disease protocol of low-dose radiation therapy (20-25 Gy), with three cycles of adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and imidazole carboxamide (ABVD) for children with early-stage and favorable disease, and with alternating cycles of an eight non-cross-resistant drug combination regimen (nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone [MOPP]/ABVD) for 6 months for those with bulky and unfavorable disease. Patients in advanced stages received four additional courses of MOPP/ABVD as maintenance therapy.
Results: The overall survival and freedom from progression (FFP) probabilities at 7 years are 85.7% and 81.5% respectively. FFP probabilities at 7 years in Groups 1 (58 patients in Stages I and IIA with mass/thorax [M/T] < 0.33), 2 (56 patients in Stages IEA, IB, IIA with M/T > 0.33, IIB, and IIIA), and 3 (38 patients in Stages IIIB and IVA and B) were 94.8%, 81.4%, and 60.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed B symptoms, M/T > 0.33, and stage to be significant, independent prognostic factors affecting survival and FFP curves.
Conclusions: The encouraging results in early-stage disease indicate the validity of using less toxic treatment in this subgroup to maximize quality of life. Patients with bulky mediastinal disease tended to fare worse than those with M/T < 0.33 or without mediastinal involvement (FFP at 7 years: 69.4% versus 93.3%) and showed early local recurrence. In advanced stages, the eight-drug combination regimen (MOPP/ABVD) plus low-dose radiation therapy provided no major improvement in outcome; here, alternative chemotherapeutic regimens should be tested in a large, randomized, clinical trial to evaluate their efficacy and determine the frequency of delayed toxicity.