Postponed endoscopic necrosectomy results in a lower rate of additional intervention for infected walled-off necrosis

Sci Rep. 2024 May 21;14(1):11610. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61675-2.

Abstract

Although endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) is more frequently used to manage walled-off necrosis (WON), there is still debate over how much time should pass between the initial stent placement and the first necrosectomy. This study aims to determine the effect of performing EN within different timings after placing the initial stent on clinical outcomes for WON. A retrospective study on infected WON patients compared an early necrosectomy within one week after the initial stent placement with a necrosectomy that was postponed after a week. The primary outcomes compared the rate of clinical success and the need for additional intervention after EN to achieve WON resolution. 77 patients were divided into early and postponed necrosectomy groups. The complete resolution of WON within six months of follow-up was attained in 73.7% and 74.3% of patients in both the early and postponed groups. The early group tended to a greater need for additional intervention after EN (26.8% early necrosectomy vs. 8.3% postponed necrosectomy, P = 0.036). Our study does not demonstrate that early necrosectomy is superior to postponed necrosectomy in terms of clinical success rate, total count of necrosectomy procedures, procedure-related complications, length of hospitalization and prognosis. Conversely, patients in the postponed group received fewer additional interventions.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Drainage / methods
  • Endoscopy / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Necrosis
  • Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing* / pathology
  • Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing* / surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stents / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome