How does the use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring influence women's experiences of labour? A systematic integrative review of the literature from high income countries

Sarah Murray; Deborah J Fox; Rebecca L Coddington; Vanessa L Scarf

doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101619

How does the use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring influence women's experiences of labour? A systematic integrative review of the literature from high income countries

Women Birth. 2024 May 15;37(4):101619. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101619. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Sarah Murray¹, Deborah J Fox², Rebecca L Coddington², Vanessa L Scarf²

Affiliations

¹ University of Technology Sydney, Collective for Midwifery Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia. Electronic address: sarah.j.murray-1@student.uts.edu.au.
² University of Technology Sydney, Collective for Midwifery Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.

PMID: 38754249
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101619

Abstract

Background: A variety of technologies are used to monitor fetal wellbeing in labour. Different types of fetal monitoring devices impact women's experiences of labour and birth.

Aim: This review aims to understand how continuous electronic fetal monitoring (CEFM) influences women's experiences, with a focus on sense of control, active decision-making and mobility.

Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted. Findings from qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies were analysed to provide a review of current evidence.

Findings: Eighteen publications were included. The findings were synthesised into three themes: 'Feeling reassured versus anxious about the welfare of their baby', 'Feeling comfortable and free to be mobile versus feeling uncomfortable and restricted', and 'Feeling respected and empowered to make decisions versus feeling depersonalised with minimal control '. Women experienced discomfort and a lack of mobility as a result of some CEFM technologies. They often felt anxious and had mixed feelings about their baby's welfare whilst these were in use. Some women valued the data produced by CEFM technologies about the welfare of their baby. Many women experienced a sense of depersonalisation and lack of control whilst CEFM technologies were used.

Discussion: Fetal monitoring technologies influence women's experiences of labour both positively and negatively. Wireless devices were associated with the most positive response as they enabled greater freedom of movement.

Conclusion: The design of emerging fetal monitoring technologies should incorporate elements which foster freedom of movement, are comfortable and provide women with a sense of choice and control. The implementation of fetal monitoring that enables these elements should be prioritised by health professionals.

Keywords: Childbirth experiences; Control; Decision-making; Fetal monitoring; Maternity care; Mobility.

Publication types

Review