Photodynamic Inactivation in agriculture: combating fungal phytopathogens resistant to conventional treatment

Linda Jernej; Danielle S M Frost; Anne-Sophie Walker; Jun Liu; Michael Fefer; Kristjan Plaetzer

doi:10.1007/s43630-024-00579-6

Photodynamic Inactivation in agriculture: combating fungal phytopathogens resistant to conventional treatment

Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2024 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s43630-024-00579-6. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Linda Jernej¹, Danielle S M Frost², Anne-Sophie Walker³, Jun Liu⁴, Michael Fefer⁴, Kristjan Plaetzer⁵

Affiliations

¹ Laboratory of Photodynamic Inactivation of Microorganisms, Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
² Frost Environmental, Abbotsford, BC, Canada.
³ Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR BIOGER, Palaiseau, France.
⁴ Suncor AgroScience, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
⁵ Laboratory of Photodynamic Inactivation of Microorganisms, Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. kristjan.plaetzer@plus.ac.at.

PMID: 38750328
DOI: 10.1007/s43630-024-00579-6

Abstract

Botrytis cinerea is a severe threat in agriculture, as it can infect over 200 different crop species with gray mold affecting food yields and quality. The conventional treatment using fungicides lead to emerging resistance over the past decades. Here, we introduce Photodynamic Inactivation (PDI) as a strategy to combat B. cinerea infections, independent of fungicide resistance. PDI uses photoactive compounds, which upon illumination create reactive oxygen species toxic for killing target organisms. This study focuses on different formulations of sodium-magnesium-chlorophyllin (Chl, food additive E140) as photoactive compound in combination with EDTA disodium salt dihydrate (Na₂EDTA) as cell-wall permeabilizer and a surfactant. In an in vitro experiment, three different photosensitizers (PS) with varying Chl and Na₂EDTA concentrations were tested against five B. cinerea strains with different resistance mechanisms. We showed that all B. cinerea mycelial spheres of all tested strains were eradicated with concentrations as low as 224 µM Chl and 3.076 mM Na₂EDTA (LED illumination with main wavelength of 395 nm, radiant exposure 106 J cm^-2). To further test PDI as a Botrytis treatment strategy in agriculture a greenhouse trial was performed on B. cinerea infected bell pepper plants (Capsicum annum L). Two different rates (560 or 1120 g Ha^-1) of PS formulation (0.204 M Chl and 1.279 M Na₂EDTA) and a combination of PS formulation with 0.05% of the surfactant BRIJ L4 (560 g Ha^-1) were applied weekly for 4 weeks by spray application. Foliar lesions, percentage of leaves affected, percentage of leaf area diseased and AUDPC were significantly reduced, while percentage of marketable plants were increased by all treatments compared to a water treated control, however, did not statistically differ from each other. No phytotoxicity was observed in any treatment. These results add to the proposition of employing PDI with the naturally sourced PS Chl in agricultural settings aimed at controlling B. cinerea disease. This approach seems to be effective regardless of the evolving resistance mechanisms observed in response to conventional antifungal treatments.

Keywords: Botrytis cinerea; Antimicrobial resistance; Chlorophyllin; Greenhouse trial; Photodynamic Inactivation.