Cartiva interpositional arthroplasty versus arthrodesis in the treatment of Hallux rigidus: A retrospective comparative study with mean 2 year follow up

T L Lewis; S Trowbridge; S Franklin; B Lau; R Shehata; S Lyle; R Ray

doi:10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.003

Cartiva interpositional arthroplasty versus arthrodesis in the treatment of Hallux rigidus: A retrospective comparative study with mean 2 year follow up

Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 May 10:S1268-7731(24)00103-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.003. Online ahead of print.

Authors

T L Lewis¹, S Trowbridge², S Franklin², B Lau², R Shehata², S Lyle², R Ray²

Affiliations

¹ King's Foot and Ankle Unit, King's College NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. Electronic address: t.lewis2@nhs.net.
² King's Foot and Ankle Unit, King's College NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

PMID: 38744636
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.003

Abstract

Background: Hallux rigidus is a common condition characterised by first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) degeneration, pain and limited range of motion (ROM). The gold standard surgical treatment is arthrodesis, providing good pain relief, but sacrifices ROM. The Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) has been utilised as an interpositional arthroplasty, aiming to reduce pain whilst preserving range of motion. Current evidence for Cartiva SCI is limited. The aim was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Cartiva SCI compared to arthrodesis undertaken in our centre.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling all adult patients who underwent primary first MTPJ SCI arthroplasty or arthrodesis for the treatment hallux rigidus. The primary outcome was a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Secondary outcomes included EQ-5D, complication rates, VAS Pain and FAAM (ADL).

Results: Between 2017 and 2020 there were 33 cases divided into two groups (17 Cartiva SCI, 16 arthrodesis, mean age 59.0 ± 9.9 years) with a mean follow up of 2.3 years. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the MOXFQ, EQ-5D, VAS Pain or FAAM (ADL) outcome scores between the Arthrodesis and SCI groups (p > 0.05). The mean MOXFQ Index score was 7.2 ± 6.4 for the SCI group and 3.9 ± 5.8 for the Arthrodesis group at final follow up (p = 0.15). Although complications were high in both groups, the overall hallux reoperation rate was 29.4 % in the SCI cohort and 0.0 % for arthrodesis.

Conclusion: This retrospective comparative study found no significant superiority of Cartiva SCI over arthrodesis in terms of PROMs. Due to the higher rate of further surgical intervention in the SCI cohort, we recommend arthrodesis as the preferred surgical option for hallux rigidus.

Level of evidence: III.

Keywords: Arthrodesis; Arthroplasty; Cartiva; Comparative study; Forefoot surgery; Hallux Rigidus; Joint fusion; MOXFQ; Metatarsophalangeal joint; Osteoarthritis.