Does sadness bring myopia: an intertemporal choice experiment with college students

Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 26:15:1345951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345951. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: While economics often interprets individual intertemporal choice preferences through the rationality assumption of utility maximization, the reality is that as emotional beings, individuals' preferences for intertemporal behavior are much more diverse and inconsistent. Prior research has predominantly focused on positive or negative emotions based on prospect theory, such as anxiety, anger, disgust, and depression. However, there has been relatively little research on how sadness affects individuals' preferences for immediate and future rewards.

Methods: In this study, 170 college students are recruited as participants, and their emotions are primed with a video before engaging in an intertemporal task. Covariance analysis and logit regression model are established to examine the main and interactive effects of sadness on individuals' immediate reward preferences.

Results: The findings reveal that sadness led individuals to prefer smaller immediate rewards, demonstrating a more myopic behavioral pattern, but didn't affect time discount rate. As the reward baseline increases, sadness's impact on immediate reward preferences is more pronounced, exacerbating individuals' myopic behavior.

Discussion: In conclusion, these findings underscore the importance of considering emotional states in economic decision-making models and suggest avenues for future research to explore the complex dynamics of emotions and intertemporal choices.

Keywords: intertemporal choice; logit regression analysis; moderating effect; sadness; short-sighted behavior.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by “Youth Fund of the Ministry of Education”(18YJCZH233): “Research on the plastic mechanism of decision-making impulsiveness of anxious groups in the context of risk society.”