Eye-tracking-based analysis of pharmacists' thought processes in the dispensing work: research related to the efficiency in dispensing based on right-brain thinking

Toshikazu Tsuji; Kenichiro Nagata; Masayuki Tanaka; Shigeru Hasebe; Takashi Yukita; Mayako Uchida; Kimitaka Suetsugu; Takeshi Hirota; Ichiro Ieiri

doi:10.1186/s40780-024-00341-1

Eye-tracking-based analysis of pharmacists' thought processes in the dispensing work: research related to the efficiency in dispensing based on right-brain thinking

J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2024 May 10;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40780-024-00341-1.

Authors

Toshikazu Tsuji¹, Kenichiro Nagata², Masayuki Tanaka³, Shigeru Hasebe³, Takashi Yukita³, Mayako Uchida⁴, Kimitaka Suetsugu², Takeshi Hirota², Ichiro Ieiri²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Setsunan University, Osaka, Japan. toshikazu.tsuji@setsunan.ac.jp.
² Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
³ Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Setsunan University, Osaka, Japan.
⁴ Department of Education and Research Center for Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Doshisha Women's College of Liberal Arts, Kyoto, Japan.

Abstract

Background: Pharmacists should be aware of their thought processes in dispensing work, including differences in the dispensing complexities owing to different drug positions in the left, center, and right areas. Dispensing errors associated with "same-name drugs (a pair of drugs with the same name but a different ingredient quantity)" are prevalent and often negatively affect patients. In this study, using five pairs of comparative models, the gaze movements of pharmacists in dispensing work were analyzed using an eye-tracking method to elucidate their thought processes.

Methods: We prepared verification slides and displayed them on a prescription monitor and three drug rack monitors. The dispensing information (drug name, drug usage, location display, and total amount) was displayed on a prescription monitor. A total of 180 drugs including five target drugs were displayed on the three drug rack monitors. Total gaze points in the prescription area, those in the drug rack area, total vertical movements between the two areas, and time required to dispense drugs were measured as the four classifications Gaze 1, Gaze 2, Passage, and Time, respectively. First, we defined the two types of location displays as "numeral combination" and "color/symbol combination." Next, we defined two pairs of models A₁-A₂ (numerals) and B₁-B₂ (color/symbol) to compare differences between the left and right areas. Moreover, three pairs of models C₁-C₂ (left), D₁-D₂ (center), and E₁-E₂ (right) were established to compare differences between "numeral combination" and "color/symbol combination."

Results: Significant differences in the complexities of dispensing work were observed in Gaze 2, Passage, and Time between the models A₁-A₂ (A₁<A₂), in Gaze 2 between the models B₁-B₂ (B₁>B₂), and in Gaze 2 and Time between the models C₁-C₂, D₁-D₂, and E₁-E₂ (C₁>C₂, D₁>D₂, and E₁>E₂, respectively).

Conclusions: Using the current dispensing rules, pharmacists are not good at dispensing drugs located in the right area. An effective measure for reducing the dispensing complexity is to introduce visual information in the prescription content; the utilization of the right brain facilitates reducing the complexity in the right dispensing area.

Keywords: Comparative models; Dispensing complexity; Eye-tracking method; Right-brain thinking; Thought process.