Mapping interictal discharges using intracranial EEG-fMRI to predict postsurgical outcomes

Brain. 2024 May 9:awae148. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae148. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Various subjective and objective methods have been proposed to identify which interictal epileptiform discharge (IED)-related EEG-fMRI results are more likely to delineate seizure generating tissue in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy for the purposes of surgical planning. In this intracranial EEG-fMRI study, we evaluated the utility of these methods to localize clinically relevant regions pre-operatively and compared the extent of resection of these areas to post-operative outcome. Seventy patients admitted for intracranial video-EEG monitoring were recruited for a simultaneous intracranial EEG-fMRI study. For all analyses of blood oxygen level-dependent responses associated with IEDs, an experienced epileptologist identified the most Clinically Relevant brain activation cluster using available clinical information. The Maximum cluster (the cluster with the highest z-score) was also identified for all analyses and assigned to one of three confidence levels (low, medium, or high) based on the difference of the peak z-scores between the Maximum and Second Maximum cluster (the cluster with the second highest peak z-value). The distance was measured and compared between the peak voxel of the aforementioned clusters and the electrode contacts where the interictal discharge and seizure onset were recorded. In patients who subsequently underwent epilepsy surgery, the spatial concordance between the aforementioned clusters and the area of resection was determined and compared to post-operative outcome. We evaluated 106 different IEDs in 70 patients. Both subjective (identification of the Clinically Relevant cluster) and objective (Maximum cluster much more significant than the second maximum cluster) methods of culling non-localizing EEG-fMRI activation maps increased the spatial concordance between these clusters and the corresponding IED or seizure onset zone contacts. However, only the objective methods of identifying medium and high confidence maps resulted in a significant association between resection of the peak voxel of the Maximum cluster and post-operative outcome. Resection of this area was associated with good post-operative outcomes but was not sufficient for seizure freedom. On the other hand, we found that failure to resect the medium and high confidence Maximum clusters was associated with a poor post-surgical outcome (negative predictive value = 1.0, sensitivity = 1.0). Objective methods to identify higher confidence EEG-fMRI results are needed to localize areas necessary for good post-operative outcomes. However, resection of the peak voxel within higher confidence Maximum clusters is not sufficient for good outcomes. Conversely, failure to resect the peak voxel in these clusters is associated with a poor post-surgical outcome.

Keywords: electroencephalography; epilepsy; imaging; markers; seizures; surgery.