Nursing-sensitive outcomes for the provision of pain management in pediatric populations with intellectual disabilities: a scoping review protocol

Morgan MacNeil; Helen McCord; Lynsey Alcock; Amy Mireault; Melissa Rothfus; Marsha Campbell-Yeo

doi:10.11124/JBIES-23-00133

Nursing-sensitive outcomes for the provision of pain management in pediatric populations with intellectual disabilities: a scoping review protocol

JBI Evid Synth. 2024 May 9. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00133. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Morgan MacNeil^{1

2}, Helen McCord², Lynsey Alcock², Amy Mireault², Melissa Rothfus^{3

4}, Marsha Campbell-Yeo^{1

2

5

4}

Affiliations

¹ School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
² IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.
³ W.K. Kellogg Health Sciences Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
⁴ Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A JBI Centre of Excellence, School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
⁵ Department of Pediatrics, Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

PMID: 38720637
DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00133

Abstract

Objective: This aim of this review is to identify and map nursing-sensitive outcomes for the provision of pain management in pediatric populations with intellectual disabilities that are currently reported in the literature.

Introduction: The experience of pain is highly individualized and subjective, with physiological, biochemical, and psychological differences contributing to pain perception. Pediatric populations with intellectual disabilities are at increased risk of ubiquitous pain exposure. Pain management effectiveness can be determined through the measurement of nursing-sensitive outcomes, which have not been mapped in the context of pediatric populations with intellectual disabilities.

Inclusion criteria: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, and gray literature discussing nursing pain management in pediatric populations with intellectual disabilities will be included. No date limits will be applied. Only studies published in English will be considered.

Methods: This review will be guided by the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will aim to locate published and unpublished literature using the databases CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Scopus, PsycINFO (ProQuest), LILACS, SciELO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Titles and abstracts, and then full-text studies, will be selected and reviewed by 2 independent researchers against the inclusion criteria. Content analysis using the NNQR-C, C-HOBIC, NDNQI, and Donabedian model frameworks will be used for data extraction and organization, accompanied by charted results and narrative summaries, as appropriate.