Background: The use of three-dimensional (3D) technology helps surgeons in performing autologous microtia reconstruction due to more accurate measurements and a better precision template model. However, the technical aspects of using a 3D imaging and 3D-printed model and the difference in outcomes postoperatively remain poorly reviewed.
Purpose: This systematic review aimed to provide the current evidence of the benefit and technical aspects of using 3D technology in autologous microtia reconstruction.
Method: A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases: Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Central until June 2022. Studies that evaluated the use of 3D imaging or 3D-printed models for autogenous microtia reconstruction were selected. The quality of the included studies was also assessed with respect to the study design.
Result: A systematic literature search yielded 17 articles with a combination of observational and case report studies. Overall, 3D imaging showed a precise measurement for preoperative costal cartilage assessment. Compared to the 2D template, the utilization of a 3D-printed template provided a higher similarity rate relative to the unaffected ear, higher patient and surgeon satisfaction, and lower surgical time. Most 3D templates were fabricated using polylactic acid material on fused deposition modelling printers. The template costs were ranging from $1 to $4.5 depending on the material used.
Conclusion: 3D imaging and 3D-printed templates could improve the outcome of autologous microtia reconstruction. However, the quality of the existing evidence remains low due to the heterogeneity of the reported outcomes. Further studies with more adequate comparability and defined outcomes are still required.
Keywords: 3D imaging; 3D-printed model; autologous; microtia; reconstruction.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.