Purpose: To describe gender diversity and research productivity among medical education boards.
Methods: We examined gender, training status, and research productivity of board members of Journal Citation Reports-listed medical education journals and affiliated professional societies. We determined gender using gendered pronouns and-if unavailable-software. We evaluated differences using χ2 and t-tests.
Results: Overall, half of board members but 44% of editors-in-chief and 20% of society leaders were female. Female-led journals and societies had higher female representation than their non-female-led counterparts; trainee board members were more likely to be female.
Conclusions: Gender disparities exist among executives on journal and affiliated professional society boards in medical education.
Keywords: Gender diversity; Health equity; Medical education; Representation.
© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2024.