The integration of GPS and visual navigation for autonomous navigation of an Ackerman steering mobile robot in cotton fields

Front Robot AI. 2024 Apr 12:11:1359887. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1359887. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Autonomous navigation in agricultural fields presents a unique challenge due to the unpredictable outdoor environment. Various approaches have been explored to tackle this task, each with its own set of challenges. These include GPS guidance, which faces availability issues and struggles to avoid obstacles, and vision guidance techniques, which are sensitive to changes in light, weeds, and crop growth. This study proposes a novel idea that combining GPS and visual navigation offers an optimal solution for autonomous navigation in agricultural fields. Three solutions for autonomous navigation in cotton fields were developed and evaluated. The first solution utilized a path tracking algorithm, Pure Pursuit, to follow GPS coordinates and guide a mobile robot. It achieved an average lateral deviation of 8.3 cm from the pre-recorded path. The second solution employed a deep learning model, specifically a fully convolutional neural network for semantic segmentation, to detect paths between cotton rows. The mobile rover then navigated using the Dynamic Window Approach (DWA) path planning algorithm, achieving an average lateral deviation of 4.8 cm from the desired path. Finally, the two solutions were integrated for a more practical approach. GPS served as a global planner to map the field, while the deep learning model and DWA acted as a local planner for navigation and real-time decision-making. This integrated solution enabled the robot to navigate between cotton rows with an average lateral distance error of 9.5 cm, offering a more practical method for autonomous navigation in cotton fields.

Keywords: dynamic window approach; fully convolutional neural network; path between cotton row detection; precision agriculture; pure pursuit.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was partially funded by US Cotton Incorporated Project 22-727, and US Georgia Peanut Commission.